Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
The duty to do the best for one's patient
- Correspondence to
Professor Roger Crisp, St Anne's College, Oxford OX2 6HS, USA; roger.crisp{at}st-annes.ox.ac.uk
Citation
The duty to do the best for one's patient
Publication history
- Received October 2, 2013
- Revised January 3, 2014
- Accepted February 3, 2014
- First published March 6, 2014.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Fidelity to the healing relationship: a medical student's challenge to contemporary bioethics and prescription for medical practice
- NHS constitution values for values-based recruitment: a virtue ethics perspective
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- and the profession of medicine
- A virtue ethics approach to moral dilemmas in medicine
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- Teaching practical wisdom in medicine through clinical judgement, goals of care, and ethical reasoning
- Will you give my kidney back? Organ restitution in living-related kidney transplantation: ethical analyses
- Character failings in the surgeon fallen from grace: a thematic analysis of disciplinary hearings against surgeons 2016–2020
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”