Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Treatment decisions are difficult when outcomes are highly uncertain. Many life-saving interventions produce a variety of outcomes and no one can predict precisely where a particular patient will end up. It is also impossible to predict exactly how patients will evaluate outcomes that leave them with fewer abilities than they once had.
In Long-term survival with unfavourable outcome: a qualitative and ethical analysis, Stephen Honeybul and colleagues present some surprising information about patients’ adaptive capacities.1 The analysis describes the results of semistructured interviews with patients who had life-saving surgery (decompressive craniectomy) following severe brain trauma. Patients suffering traumatic brain injury are incapacitated, and so the surgery decision must be made by clinicians and family members.
Decompressive craniectomy yields a range of outcomes, including full recovery, mild, moderate or severe disability, and death. The authors interviewed patients in the severe disability outcome group. In all, 11 of 13 patients said that they would have consented to the surgery even if they had known its outcome. The patients expressing this view were either fully or substantially dependent on others for care. None were able to engage in activities like shopping and riding public transport on their own. Despite their limitations, they approved …
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Safety and efficacy of long-term nasobiliary drainage to treat intractable pruritus in cholestatic liver disease
- Factors associated with a reduction in the quality of life of patients with chronic hepatitis C treated by ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy
- Traumatic subdural haematoma: integrating case-based clinical judgement with guidelines
- Ethical considerations for performing decompressive craniectomy as a life-saving intervention for severe traumatic brain injury
- Long-term survival with unfavourable outcome: a qualitative and ethical analysis
- Controversies and evidence gaps in the early management of severe traumatic brain injury: back to the ABCs
- Neurotrauma and the RUB: where tragedy meets ethics and science
- Survival after traumatic brain injury improves with deployment of neurosurgeons: a comparison of US and UK military treatment facilities during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts
- Comparative effectiveness of different surgical procedures for traumatic acute epidural haematoma: study protocol for Prospective, Observational Real-world Treatments of AEDH in Large-scale Surgical Cases (PORTALS-AEDH)
- Traumatic brain injury in adults