Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics: response
Saviour Siblings: reply to critics
- Correspondence to Dr Michelle Taylor-Sands, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne 3010, Australia; m.taylor-sands{at}unimelb.edu.au
Citation
Saviour Siblings: reply to critics
Publication history
- Received September 17, 2015
- Accepted October 1, 2015
- First published October 28, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- Establishing the role of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis with human leucocyte antigen typing: what place do “saviour siblings” have in paediatric transplantation?
- Do we need an alternative ‘relational approach’ to saviour siblings?
- A relational approach to saviour siblings?
- Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?
- Children who benefit families
- Preimplantation HLA typing: having children to save our loved ones
- Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the “perfect child” of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and rational choice under risk or uncertainty
- “Saviour siblings”