Article Text

PDF
Paper
Challenges with participant reimbursement: experiences from a post-trial access study
  1. Kathryn Therese Mngadi1,2,
  2. Janet Frohlich1,
  3. Carl Montague1,
  4. Jerome Singh1,3,
  5. Nelisiwe Nkomonde1,
  6. Nomzamo Mvandaba1,
  7. Fanelesibonge Ntombeka1,
  8. Londiwe Luthuli1,
  9. Quarraisha Abdool Karim1,4,
  10. Leila Mansoor1
  1. 1Department of HIV Prevention, Centre for the AIDS Program of Research in South Africa, University of Kwazulu Natal, Durban, Kwazulu Natal, South Africa
  2. 2School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Kwazulu Natal, South Africa
  3. 3Department of HIV Prevention, Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Alberta, Canada
  4. 4Department if Epidemiology, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Kathryn Therese Mngadi, Department of HIV Prevention, Centre for the AIDS Program of Research in South Africa, University of Kwazulu Natal, Durban, Kwazulu Natal 4013, South Africa; kathy.mngadi{at}caprisa.org

Abstract

Reimbursement of trial participants remains a frequently debated issue, with specific guidance lacking. Trials combining post-trial access and implementation science may necessitate new strategies and models. CAPRISA 008, a post-trial access study testing the feasibility of using family planning services to rollout a prelicensure HIV prevention intervention, tried to balance the real-life scenario of no reimbursement for attendance at public sector clinics with that of a trial including some visits that focused on research procedures and others that focused on standard of care procedures. A reduced reimbursement was offered for ‘standard of care’ visits, meant primarily to cover transport costs to and from the clinic only. This impacted negatively on accrual, retention and participant morale, primarily due to the protracted delay in regulatory approval, during which time, the costs of living, including travel costs had increased. Relevant guidelines were reviewed and institutional policy was updated to incorporate the South African National Health Research Ethics Committee guidelines on reimbursement (taking into account participant time, travel and inconvenience). The reimbursement amount for ‘standard of care’ visits was increased accordingly. The question remains whether a trial that combines post-trial access with implementation science, with clear benefits for the participants and the provision of above standard medical care, should have reimbursement rates that approach those of a proof-of-concept trial, for ‘standard of care’ visits.

  • Research Ethics
  • HIV Infection and AIDS
  • Interests of Health Personnel/Institutions
  • Scientific Research
  • Clinical trials

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles