Article Text
JME40: Good medical ethics
Paper
Medical humanities and medical alterity in fiction and in life
Abstract
A widely accepted component of any answer to the question ‘What is it to do good medical ethics?’ is the commitment to benefit people's health, in principlist terminology, ‘beneficence’. This paper addresses deliberate maleficence and the cultural otherness with which it is associated, focusing on the activities of the serial killer Dr Harold Shipman. It finds an uncanny ‘fit’ between the normal operation of healthcare services and this sort of alterity which has attracted little attention from bioethicists but has been addressed by novelists. To the extent that the medical humanities offers useful insights into hard moral problems, its capacities rest on taking account of both the fictional and the real.
- Death
- Professional - Professional Relationship
- Quality of Health Care
- Criminal Law
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Other content recommended for you
- What is it to do good medical ethics? A kaleidoscope of views
- Serial homicide by doctors: Shipman in perspective
- Lethal practice
- Good medical ethics, from the inside out—and back again
- A comparison of two surveillance systems for deaths related to violent injury
- The patient/client/consumer/service user and medical ethics 40 years on
- What is a natural cause of death? A survey of how coroners in England and Wales approach borderline cases
- Good and not so good medical ethics
- The impossibility of informed consent?
- Murder misdiagnosed as SIDS: a perpetrator's perspective