Article Text
Abstract
Some issues in medical ethics have been present throughout the history of medicine, and thus provide us with an opportunity to ascertain: (1) whether there is progress in medical ethics; and (2) what it means to do good medical ethics. One such perennial issue is physician assistance in dying (PAD). This paper provides an account of the PAD debate in this journal over the last 40 years. It concludes that there is some (but limited) progress in the debate. The distinctions, analogies and hypothetical examples have proliferated, as have empirical studies, but very little has changed in terms of the basic arguments. The paper further argues that many of the contributions to the debate fail to engage fully with the concerns people have about the legal introduction of PAD in the healthcare system, perhaps because many of the contributions sit on the borderline between academic analysis and social activism.
- Physician assistance in dying
- euthanasia
- physician assisted suicide
- conscientious objection
- method in medical ethics
- progress in medical ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Other content recommended for you
- What is it to do good medical ethics? A kaleidoscope of views
- Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of Roe v Wade
- Conscientious objection and physician-assisted suicide: a viable option in the UK?
- Medical ethics and more: ideal theories, non-ideal theories and conscientious objection
- Good medical ethics
- The relationship between medical law and good medical ethics
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- The Assisted Dying Bill and the role of the physician
- Doing good medical ethics: a Christian perspective
- Australian pharmacists’ perspectives on physician-assisted suicide (PAS): thematic analysis of semistructured interviews