Article Text
Abstract
It is the JME's 40th anniversary and my 20th anniversary working in the field. I reflect on the nature of bioethics and medical ethics. I argue that both bioethics and medical ethics together have, in many ways, failed as fields. My diagnosis is that better philosophy is needed. I give some examples of the importance of philosophy to bioethics. I focus mostly on the failure of ethics in research and organ transplantation, although I also consider genetic selection, enhancement, cloning, futility, disability and other topics. I do not consider any topic comprehensively or systematically or address the many reasonable objections to my arguments. Rather, I seek to illustrate why philosophical analysis and argument remain as important as ever to progress in bioethics and medical ethics.
- Research Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Other content recommended for you
- Can one do good medical ethics without principles?
- ‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: an argument against moral enhancement
- Applying the four principles
- Getting beyond the welfare of the child in assisted reproduction
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- A threshold of significant harm (f)or a viable alternative therapeutic option?
- Decision-making at the border of viability: determining the best interests of extremely preterm infants
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- Principlism and communitarianism
- Better to hesitate at the threshold of compulsion: PKU testing and the concept of family autonomy in Eire