Article info
JME40: Good medical ethics
Paper
Medical ethics and more: ideal theories, non-ideal theories and conscientious objection
- Correspondence to Dr Florencia Luna, Bioethics Program, FLACSO-Argentina, CONICET, Ayacucho 555, Caba C1026AAC, Argentina; florlunaflacso{at}gmail.com
Citation
Medical ethics and more: ideal theories, non-ideal theories and conscientious objection
Publication history
- Received August 29, 2014
- Revised October 7, 2014
- Accepted October 8, 2014
- First published December 16, 2014.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of Roe v Wade
- A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile
- Estimating the incidence of abortion: using the Abortion Incidence Complications Methodology in Ghana, 2017
- Let’s talk about conscientious objection
- What is it to do good medical ethics? A kaleidoscope of views
- The ethics of sexual reorientation: what should clinicians and researchers do?
- The Market View on conscientious objection: overvalued
- The debate about physician assistance in dying: 40 years of unrivalled progress in medical ethics?
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- What's the point of tobacco control? Comment on Dan Halliday, ‘The ethics of a smoking licence’