Article Text
Abstract
Good medical ethics needs to look more to the resources of public health ethics and use more societal, population or community values and perspectives, rather than defaulting to the individualistic values that currently dominate discussion. In this paper I argue that we can use the recent response to Ebola as an example of a major failure of the global community in three ways. First, the focus has been on the treatment of individuals rather than seeing that the priority ought to be public health measures. Second, the advisory committee on experimental interventions set up by the WHO has focused on ethical issues related to individuals and their guidance has been unclear. Third, the Ebola issue can be seen as a symptom of a massive failure of the global community to take sufficient notice of global injustice.
- Public Health Ethics
- Philosophical Ethics
- Public Policy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Other content recommended for you
- What is it to do good medical ethics? A kaleidoscope of views
- Ebola: what it teaches us about medical ethics. A response to Angus Dawson
- The Ebola clinical trials: a precedent for research ethics in disasters
- Practising what we preach
- Good medical ethics, from the inside out—and back again
- Can one do good medical ethics without principles?
- What is it to do good medical ethics? Minding the gap(s)
- The formative years: medical ethics comes of age
- Good medical ethics
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics