Article info
PDFCommentary
Surgical castration, coercive offers and coercive effects: it is still not about consent
Citation
Surgical castration, coercive offers and coercive effects: it is still not about consent
Publication history
- Received May 14, 2014
- Accepted June 11, 2014
- First published August 13, 2014.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- The kindest cut? Surgical castration, sex offenders and coercive offers
- Surgical castration, Texas law and the case of Mr T
- Offering castration to sex offenders: the significance of the state's intentions
- Surgical castration, coercion and ethics
- There are (STILL) no coercive offers
- Making the cut: analytical and empirical bioethics
- Chemical castration for sex offenders
- Neurointerventions and informed consent
- Drug treatment is proposed to manage child sex offenders
- Experimental interventions with sex offenders: a brief review of their efficacy