Article Text
Abstract
The enhancement of human traits has received academic attention for decades, but only recently has moral enhancement using biomedical means – moral bioenhancement (MB) – entered the discussion. After explaining why we ought to take the possibility of MB seriously, the paper considers the shape and content of moral improvement, addressing at some length a challenge presented by reasonable moral pluralism. The discussion then proceeds to this question: Assuming MB were safe, effective, and universally available, would it be morally desirable? In particular, would it pose an unacceptable threat to human freedom? After defending a negative answer to the latter question – which requires an investigation into the nature and value of human freedom – and arguing that there is nothing inherently wrong with MB, the paper closes with reflections on what we should value in moral behaviour.
- Enhancement
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- The concise argument
Other content recommended for you
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- A question about defining moral bioenhancement
- Taking liberties with free fall
- Moral bioenhancement is dangerous
- Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias
- Are we unfit for the future?
- Frequently overlooked realistic moral bioenhancement interventions
- Moral bioenhancement: a neuroscientific perspective
- Moral bioenhancement, freedom and reasoning