Responses
Editorial
Forthcoming practical framework for ethics committees and researchers on post-trial access to the trial intervention and healthcare
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 29 August 2013
- Published on: 29 August 2013Post trial obligations, helthcare after research and the Declaration of Helsinki 2013 draftShow More
I believe that the practical framework produced by Sofaer, Lewis and Davies, is the best document available for research ethics committees on post- trial obligations and responsible transition of research participants from the last visit of a study to the appropriate healthcare. This document should be taken into account for future discussion of the Declaration of Helsinki 2013 draft paragraph on post-trial obligations (...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- Implementing post-trial access plans for HIV prevention research
- Subjects’ views of obligations to ensure post-trial access to drugs, care and information: qualitative results from the Experiences of Participants in Clinical Trials (EPIC) study
- Challenges with participant reimbursement: experiences from a post-trial access study
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- The ethics of research related to health care in developing countries
- Investigation of post-trial access views among study participants and stakeholders using photovoice and semistructured interviews
- Undue inducement: a case study in CAPRISA 008
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- A framework for assessing the ethics of doctors' strikes
- How to write a systematic review of reasons