Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About

JME Commentaries
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Table of contents

April 2014 - Volume 40 - 4

Journal of Medical Ethics: 40 (4)

The concise argument

Freedom and moral enhancement (18 March, 2014) Free
Michael J Selgelid

Editorial

Forthcoming practical framework for ethics committees and researchers on post-trial access to the trial intervention and healthcare (5 May, 2013)
Neema Sofaer, Penney Lewis, Hugh Davies

Feature article

The moral case for the clinical placebo (8 June, 2013) Free
Azgad Gold, Pesach Lichtenberg

Clinical ethics

Paper:
The duty to be Well-informed: The case of depression
(26 April, 2013)
Charlotte Blease
Paper: Factors that facilitate or constrain the use of continuous sedation at the end of life by physicians and nurses in Belgium: results from a focus group study (14 August, 2012)
Kasper Raus, Livia Anquinet, Judith Rietjens, Luc Deliens, Freddy Mortier, Sigrid Sterckx
Paper: Approaches to suffering at the end of life: the use of sedation in the USA and Netherlands (14 September, 2012)
Judith AC Rietjens, Jennifer R Voorhees, Agnes van der Heide, Margaret A Drickamer
Commentary: Moral concerns with sedation at the end of life (7 November, 2012)
Charles Douglas

Genetics

Paper: Genetic modifications for personal enhancement: a defence (23 April, 2013)
Timothy F Murphy

Neuroethics

Paper: Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias (14 February, 2013)
Vojin Rakić
Response: Should moral bioenhancement be compulsory? Reply to Vojin Rakic (22 March, 2013)
Ingmar Persson, Julian Savulescu
Paper: Depictions of ‘brain death’ in the media: medical and ethical implications (12 April, 2013)
Ariane Daoust, Eric Racine

Reproductive ethics

Paper: Embryonic viability, parental care and the pro-life thesis: a defence of Bovens (26 April, 2013)
Jonathan Surovell

Research ethics

Paper: Achieving new levels of recall in consent to research by combining remedial and motivational techniques (4 April, 2013)
David S Festinger, Karen L Dugosh, Douglas B Marlowe, Nicolle T Clements
Paper: Informed consent as an ethical requirement in clinical trials: an old, but still unresolved issue. An observational study to evaluate patient's informed consent comprehension (31 May, 2013)
Virginia Sanchini, Michele Reni, Giliola Calori, Elisabetta Riva, Massimo Reichlin

Teaching and learning ethics

Paper: FY1 doctors’ ethicolegal challenges in their first year of clinical practice: an interview study (28 March, 2013)
Pirashanthie Vivekananda-Schmidt, Bryan Vernon

Current controversy

The outsider: the rogue scientist as terrorist (13 February, 2013)
Roderick John Flower

Viewpoint

Differentiating between human and non-human interspecies embryos (24 May, 2013)
Calum MacKellar

Response

True and false concerns about neuroenhancement: a response to ‘Neuroenhancers, addiction and research ethics’, by D M Shaw (6 March, 2013)
Andreas Heinz, Roland Kipke, Sabine Müller, Urban Wiesing

Brief report

Climate change matters (11 May, 2013)
Cheryl Cox Macpherson

Issue Information