Article info
PDFResponses
Prostitution and sexual ethics: a reply to Westin
Citation
Prostitution and sexual ethics: a reply to Westin
Publication history
- Received October 30, 2013
- Accepted November 28, 2013
- First published December 12, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- The harms of prostitution: critiquing Moen's argument of no-harm
- Is prostitution harmful?
- Men seeking sex online practise riskier sexual behaviours than men frequenting brothels: survey findings from Singapore
- Prostitution and harm: a reply to Anderson and McDougall
- High rates of unprotected anal intercourse with regular and casual partners and associated risk factors in a sample of ethnic Malay men who have sex with men (MSM) in Penang, Malaysia
- Are condoms the answer to rising rates of non-HIV sexually transmitted infection? No
- Short term estimates of adult HIV incidence by mode of transmission: Kenya and Thailand as examples
- The many faces of sex work
- Comment on ‘Is prostitution harmful?’
- Counselling for connection: making queer relationships during Britain’s sexual revolution