Article info
PDFThe concise argument
Challenging accepted ethical beliefs
Citation
Challenging accepted ethical beliefs
Publication history
- First published January 21, 2014.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- Withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration from minimally conscious and vegetative patients: family perspectives
- Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration from patients in a minimally conscious state: Re: M and its repercussions
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Precedent autonomy should be respected in life-sustaining treatment decisions
- Is it better to be minimally conscious than vegetative?
- Burdens of ANH outweigh benefits in the minimally conscious state
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?
- A matter of life and death
- Ethics briefings