Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
Rationality, religion and refusal of treatment in an ambulance revisited
- Correspondence to Kate McMahon-Parkes, University of the West of England, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Alexander Warehouse, Gloucester Docks, Gloucester, GL1 2LG, UK; kate.mcmahon-parkes{at}uwe.ac.uk
Citation
Rationality, religion and refusal of treatment in an ambulance revisited
Publication history
- Received July 11, 2011
- Revised September 14, 2011
- Accepted October 3, 2011
- First published May 16, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- A case study from the perspective of medical ethics: refusal of treatment in an ambulance
- Jehovah’s Witnesses in the emergency department: what are their rights?
- The role of religious beliefs in ethics committee consultations for conflict over life-sustaining treatment
- Methods and principles in biomedical ethics
- Physicians’ evaluations of patients’ decisions to refuse oncological treatment
- Children of Jehovah’s Witnesses and adolescent Jehovah’s Witnesses: what are their rights?
- Discussing results of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients and healthcare professionals in routine dialysis care: a qualitative study
- Personal values and cancer treatment refusal
- Management of patients with an advance decision and suicidal behaviour: a systematic review
- Disfigured anatomies and imperfect analogies: body integrity identity disorder and the supposed right to self-demanded amputation of healthy body parts