Citation Tools
PDFWithdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
Best interests and the sanctity of life after W v M
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Best interests and the sanctity of life after W v M
Other content recommended for you
- Should we respect precedent autonomy in life-sustaining treatment decisions?
- Precedent autonomy should be respected in life-sustaining treatment decisions
- Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration from patients in a minimally conscious state: Re: M and its repercussions
- A matter of life and death
- ‘In a twilight world’? Judging the value of life for the minimally conscious patient
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- The weight attributed to patient values in determining best interests
- Causes and consequences of delays in treatment-withdrawal from PVS patients: a case study of Cumbria NHS Clinical Commissioning Group v Miss S and Ors [2016] EWCOP 32
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?
- Withholding artificial nutrition and hydration