Article Text
Abstract
In 2011 the English Court of Protection ruled that it would be unlawful to withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration from a woman, M, who had been in a minimally conscious state for 8 years. It was reported as the first English legal case concerning withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration from a patient in a minimally conscious state who was otherwise stable. In the absence of a valid and applicable advance decision refusing treatment, of other life-limiting pathology or excessively burdensome suffering, the judgement makes it clear that the obligation on health professionals falls strongly in favour of preserving life. Although the Court sought to limit the judgement as closely as possible to the facts of the case, it is likely to have a significant impact on life-sustaining treatment decisions for people in states of low awareness. This paper outlines the main legal features of the judgement.
- Medical ethics
- mental health legislation
- mental health
- mental capacity
- decision-making capacity
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
- Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
- Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
- Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
- Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
- The concise argument
Other content recommended for you
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- The right to die in the minimally conscious state
- A matter of life and death
- Withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration from minimally conscious and vegetative patients: family perspectives
- Ethics briefings
- Burdens of ANH outweigh benefits in the minimally conscious state
- The weight attributed to patient values in determining best interests
- How family caregivers' medical and moral assumptions influence decision making for patients in the vegetative state: a qualitative interview study