Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Getting the justification for research ethics review right
- Correspondence to Dr Michael Dunn, The Ethox Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Rosemary Rue Building, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK; michael.dunn{at}ethox.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Getting the justification for research ethics review right
Publication history
- Received September 6, 2012
- Accepted September 20, 2012
- First published October 31, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority
- The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC
- In defence of governance: ethics review and social research
- Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues
- Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe?
- Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
- The structure of ethics review: expert ethics committees and the challenge of voluntary research euthanasia
- Justice: a key consideration in health policy and systems research ethics
- The job of ‘ethics committees’
- Nature and governance of veterinary clinical research conducted in the UK