Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Paper
Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?
- Correspondence to Dr Murray Dyck, Griffith University, School of Applied Psychology, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia; m.dyck{at}griffith.edu.au
Citation
Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?
Publication history
- Accepted July 10, 2012
- First published August 3, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- A cross-sectional survey to investigate community understanding of medical research ethics committees
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues
- Health service research: the square peg in human subjects protection regulations
- The untidy margins of ethical approval
- How not to argue against mandatory ethics review
- Research guidelines for embryoids
- Do protocols for new randomised trials take previous similar trials into account? Cohort study of contemporary trial protocols
- Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees
- Ethical frameworks in clinical research processes during COVID-19: a scoping review