Article Text
Clinical ethics
Commentary
Which newborns are too expensive to treat? A response to Dominic Wilkinson
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
↵i Frustratingly, I must even leave certain important criticisms—like those which focus on which newborns cannot benefit from treatment—without a response at beyond what I did in the book. (On this topic, for instance, I do spend significant time considering the ambiguity of determining which newborns could never benefit from treatment.)
-
↵ii As I discuss in the book, many newborns ‘declare themselves’ in the first 2–3 days in ways which make further decisions far easier.
-
↵iii In his defense, he merely gives us a sketch and would presumably have answers to my challenges if he had the space for an extended defense of his proposals.
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Which newborn infants are too expensive to treat? Camosy and rationing in intensive care
- Authoritarian versus responsive communitarian bioethics
- Drawing the line in clinical treatment of companion animals: recommendations from an ethics working party
- Ethical dilemmas encountered by small animal veterinarians: characterisation, responses, consequences and beliefs regarding euthanasia
- Is providing elective ventilation in the best interests of potential donors?
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Functional neuroimaging and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from vegetative patients
- Why active euthanasia and physician assisted suicide should be legalised
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of Roe v Wade