Article info
PDFCurrent controversies
Circumcision: What should be done?
- Correspondence to Professor Hanoch Ben-Yami, Department of Philosophy, Central European University, 9 Nador Street, Budapest 1051, Hungary; benyamih{at}ceu.hu
Citation
Circumcision: What should be done?
Publication history
- Received December 3, 2012
- Revised January 14, 2013
- Accepted January 16, 2013
- First published June 12, 2013.
Online issue publication
June 29, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (29 June 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- After Cologne: male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault?
- On the impermissibility of infant male circumcision: a response to Mazor (2013)
- Value judgment, harm, and religious liberty
- Rationalising circumcision: from tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom—critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation
- Some principles of Islamic ethics as found in Harrisian philosophy
- Religious circumcision and the Human Rights Act
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Ancient rites and new laws: how should we regulate religious circumcision of minors?
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- Male or female genital cutting: why ‘health benefits’ are morally irrelevant