Article info
Current controversies
Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest AAP policy report on neonatal circumcision
- Correspondence to J Steven Svoboda, Attorneys for the Rights of the Child, 2961 Ashby Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94707, USA; arc{at}post.harvard.edu
Citation
Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest AAP policy report on neonatal circumcision
Publication history
- Received January 14, 2013
- Revised February 18, 2013
- Accepted February 19, 2013
- First published March 18, 2013.
Online issue publication
June 18, 2013
Article Versions
- Previous version (18 March 2013).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision
- Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Male or female genital cutting: why ‘health benefits’ are morally irrelevant
- Prophylactic interventions on children: balancing human rights with public health
- Medical aspects of male circumcision
- The ethics of infant male circumcision
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Benefits of newborn circumcision: is Europe ignoring medical evidence?
- The AAP Task Force on Neonatal Circumcision: a call for respectful dialogue