Share
Other content recommended for you
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- On the impermissibility of infant male circumcision: a response to Mazor (2013)
- Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision
- Rationalising circumcision: from tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom—critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation
- Traditional male circumcision and the risk for HIV transmission among men: a systematic review
- Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest AAP policy report on neonatal circumcision
- Infant male circumcision and the autonomy of the child: two ethical questions
- Male circumcision and risk of syphilis, chancroid, and genital herpes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Routine male neonatal circumcision and risk of infection with HIV-1 and other sexually transmitted diseases