Article info
PDFElectronic pages: Responses
Paper
After-birth and before-birth personhood: why the baby should live
- Correspondence to Professor Nikolaus Johannes Knoepffler, Department of Ethics in Science, University of Jena, Zwaetzengasse 3, Jena 07743, Germany; n.knoepffler{at}uni-jena.de
Citation
After-birth and before-birth personhood: why the baby should live
Publication history
- Received August 17, 2012
- Accepted January 31, 2013
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Why should the baby live? Human right to life and the precautionary principle
- The common premise for uncommon conclusions
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the “perfect child” of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
- Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration
- Global bioethics at UNESCO: in defence of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Universal declaration of human rights