Article info
Electronic pages: Responses
Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
- Correspondence to Matthew Beard, Centre for Faith, Ethics & Society, University of Notre Dame, PO Box 944 Broadway 2007, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia; matthew.beard{at}nd.edu.au
Citation
Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
Publication history
- Received March 28, 2012
- Accepted January 31, 2013
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
May 01, 2013
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Abortion, infanticide and moral context
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Philosophy, critical thinking and ‘after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’