Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
-
↵i George doubts that the millions of people who support abortion rights do so because they deny that non-rational human beings are persons, but I can find very few people today who are not aware that the fetus is a fellow member of the species Homo sapiens. Most of those who are pro-choice believe that the fetus needs to develop further—develop a brain, feel pain, have a heartbeat, become independent of her mother, etc—before she can be considered a full member of the moral community. This view has also played out in attitudes toward those like Terri Shaivo, who many considered to be less than a full person because she, though obviously a functioning human organism, had irrevocably lost what made her a person.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Infanticide and madness
- The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper
- In defence of academic freedom: bioethics journals under siege
- Response to: Is the pro-choice position for infanticide ‘madness’?
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Cursed lamp: the problem of spontaneous abortion
- Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- The pearl of the ‘Pro-Life’ movement? Reflections on the Kermit Gosnell controversy
- Infanticide, moral status and moral reasons: the importance of context
- Birth, meaningful viability and abortion