Article info
The argument
Infanticide and madness
- Correspondence to Professor Robert P George, Visiting Professor at Harvard Law School and McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA; rgeorge{at}Princeton.edu
Citation
Infanticide and madness
Publication history
- Received November 30, 2012
- Accepted December 5, 2012
- First published May 1, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva
- Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper
- Birth, meaningful viability and abortion
- In defence of academic freedom: bioethics journals under siege