Article info
PDFResearch ethics
How IRBs make decisions: should we worry if they disagree?
- Correspondence to Dr Sharon Kaur, Faculty of Law, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia;kaursh{at}um.edu.my
Citation
How IRBs make decisions: should we worry if they disagree?
Publication history
- Received September 18, 2012
- Accepted September 19, 2012
- First published October 17, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence
- The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees
- Strengthening ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol
- The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process
- Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation?
- Education of ethics committee members: experiences from Croatia
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- Efficiency and the proposed reforms to the NHS research ethics system
- Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?
- Strengthening ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review