Article info
PDFPublic health ethics
Paper
Great expectations—ethics, avian flu and the value of progress
- Correspondence to Nicholas G Evans, Level 1, 10-12 Brisbane Ave, Barton, ACT 2600, Australia; Nick.evans{at}anu.edu.au
Citation
Great expectations—ethics, avian flu and the value of progress
Publication history
- Received April 4, 2012
- Revised September 4, 2012
- Accepted October 8, 2012
- First published October 30, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Biodefense and dual-use research: the optimisation problem and the value of security
- Biodefence and the production of knowledge: rethinking the problem
- US board gives green light to publication of bird flu studies it previously blocked
- Gain-of-function research and model organisms in biology
- Biosecurity and the division of cognitive labour
- Synthetic biology and the ethics of knowledge
- Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis—learning from the cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy
- Clinicians and patients' welfare: where does academic freedom fit in?
- US board says censuring research on avian flu was necessary to prevent a potential catastrophe
- The ethics of biosafety considerations in gain-of-function research resulting in the creation of potential pandemic pathogens