Article info
PDFElective ventilation
Paper
Elective non-therapeutic intensive care and the four principles of medical ethics
- Correspondence to Dr Antoine Baumann, Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy 54000, France; a.baumann{at}chu-nancy.fr, antoine_baumann{at}hotmail.com
Citation
Elective non-therapeutic intensive care and the four principles of medical ethics
Publication history
- Received July 30, 2012
- Revised December 7, 2012
- Accepted January 3, 2013
- First published January 26, 2013.
Online issue publication
September 24, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (24 September 2018).
- Previous version (24 September 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Dignifying death and the morality of elective ventilation
- The dead donor rule: effect on the virtuous practice of medicine
- Elective ventilation and the politics of death
- Organ donation in the surgical ICU: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document
- Does it matter that organ donors are not dead? Ethical and policy implications
- Ventilating the debate: elective ventilation revisited
- Elective ventilation for organ donation: law, policy and public ethics
- Honouring the donor: in death and in life
- The ethics of testing and research of manufactured organs on brain-dead/recently deceased subjects
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context