rss

This article has a correction

Please see: J Med Ethics 2013;39:409

J Med Ethics 39:139-142 doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100990
  • Elective ventilation
  • Paper

Elective non-therapeutic intensive care and the four principles of medical ethics

  1. Frédérique Claudot4
  1. 1Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France
  2. 2Centre Maurice Halbwachs, CNRS, Paris, France
  3. 3Neuro Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France
  4. 4Service de Médecine légale et de Droit de la Santé, Faculté de Médecine, Nancy, France
  1. Correspondence to Dr Antoine Baumann, Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy 54000, France; a.baumann{at}chu-nancy.fr, antoine_baumann{at}hotmail.com
  • Received 30 July 2012
  • Revised 7 December 2012
  • Accepted 3 January 2013
  • Published Online First 26 January 2013

Abstract

The chronic worldwide lack of organs for transplantation and the continuing improvement of strategies for in situ organ preservation have led to renewed interest in elective non-therapeutic ventilation of potential organ donors. Two types of situation may be eligible for elective intensive care: patients definitely evolving towards brain death and patients suitable as controlled non-heart beating organ donors after life-supporting therapies have been assessed as futile and withdrawn. Assessment of the ethical acceptability and the risks of these strategies is essential. We here offer such an ethical assessment using the four principles of medical ethics of Beauchamp and Childress applying them in their broadest sense so as to include patients and their families, their caregivers, other potential recipients of intensive care, and indeed society as a whole. The main ethical problems emerging are the definition of beneficence for the potential organ donor, the dilemma between the duty to respect a dying patient's autonomy and the duty not to harm him/her, and the possible psychological and social harm for families, caregivers other potential recipients of therapeutic intensive care, and society more generally. Caution is expressed about the ethical acceptability of elective non-therapeutic ventilation, along with some proposals for precautionary measures to be taken if it is to be implemented.

Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JME.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article