Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
Ethics policy review: a case study in quality improvement
- Correspondence to Dr Andrea Frolic, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University Medical Centre, 1F9-1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8N 3Z5; frolic{at}hhsc.ca
Citation
Ethics policy review: a case study in quality improvement
Publication history
- Received December 16, 2011
- Revised July 6, 2012
- Accepted September 21, 2012
- First published October 31, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Development of clinical ethics services in the UK: a national survey
- Legal aspects of clinical ethics committees
- Clinical ethics support services in the UK: an investigation of the current provision of ethics support to health professionals in the UK
- Challenging misconceptions about clinical ethics support during COVID-19 and beyond: a legal update and future considerations
- Evaluating a clinical ethics committee (CEC) implementation process in an oncological research hospital: protocol for a process evaluation study using normalisation process theory (EvaCEC)
- What is the role of clinical ethics support in the era of e-medicine?
- Consultation activities of clinical ethics committees in the United Kingdom: an empirical study and wake-up call
- Importance of systematic deliberation and stakeholder presence: a national study of clinical ethics committees
- Ethics support in clinical practice
- The quality of bioethics debate: implications for clinical ethics committees