Article info
PDFCommentaries
Still afraid of needy post-persons
- Correspondence to Dr Nicholas Agar, Victoria University of Wellington, Philosophy Program, Wellington 6140, New Zealand; nicholas.agar{at}vuw.ac.nz
Citation
Still afraid of needy post-persons
Publication history
- Received October 3, 2012
- Accepted October 24, 2012
- First published November 17, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- The biomedical enhancement of moral status
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Why we can't really say what post-persons are
- Highlights from this issue
- Genetic Enhancement, Post-persons, and Moral Status: Author reply to commentaries
- Self-serving bias and the structure of moral status
- Devoured by our own children: the possibility and peril of moral status enhancement
- Still unconvinced, but still tentative: a reply to DeGrazia
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility