Article info
PDFCommentary
Is active recruitment of health workers really not guilty of enabling harm or facilitating wrongdoing?
- Correspondence to Dr Gillian Brock, Philosophy Department, University of Auckland, Arts 2, Room 322, 18 Symonds Street, Auckland 1142, New Zealand; g.brock{at}auckland.ac.nz
Citation
Is active recruitment of health workers really not guilty of enabling harm or facilitating wrongdoing?
Publication history
- Received October 21, 2012
- Accepted October 29, 2012
- First published November 23, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Defending the active recruitment of health workers: a response to commentators
- The financial cost of doctors emigrating from sub-Saharan Africa: human capital analysis
- The active recruitment of health workers: a defence
- The cost of inaction on health equity and its social determinants
- Managing medical migration from poor countries
- Brain drain in sub-Saharan Africa: contributing factors, potential remedies and the role of academic medical centres
- Return on investment of a model of access combining triage with initial management: an economic analysis
- Association between livelihood capital and catastrophic health expenditure among patients with critical illness: a cross-sectional study in rural Shandong, China
- Investing in non-communicable disease risk factor control among adolescents worldwide: a modelling study
- What should be done to address losses associated with ‘medical brain drain’?