Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings
- Correspondence to Dr David B Resnik, NIEHS, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, Box 12233, Mail Drop CU 108, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA; resnikd{at}niehs.nih.gov
Citation
Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings
Publication history
- Received May 2, 2012
- Revised August 1, 2012
- Accepted August 4, 2012
- First published September 1, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008
- Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018
- Empirical developments in retraction
- Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
- Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
- Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central
- Why unethical papers should be retracted
- Retractions in the medical literature: how can patients be protected from risk?
- Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct
- The fraud squad