Article Text

PDF
Paper
Terminating clinical trials without sufficient subjects
  1. Lianne Damen,
  2. Frans van Agt,
  3. Theo de Boo,
  4. Frans Huysmans
  1. Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek, Research Ethics Committee, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Lianne Damen, Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek, Research Ethics Committee, PO Box 9101, Internal Code 578, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; l.damen{at}iwkv.umcn.nl

Abstract

Medical research involving human subjects can be risky and burdensome. Therefore, such research must be reviewed and approved by a Research Ethics Committee (REC). To guarantee the safety of the subjects, it is very important that these studies be conducted in accordance with the approved protocol. An important issue in this respect is whether studies include the requisite number of subjects based on the research question. The research question is unlikely to be answered reliably if the requisite number of subjects is not met. In such cases, subjects are exposed to unnecessary risks and burdens. In this descriptive study, the authors evaluated how frequently studies are completed with the required number of subjects. Moreover, the authors identified the characteristics of research that does and does not include the required number of subjects. The results of this study show that a considerable proportion of studies (41/107) were terminated although they failed to recruit a sufficient number of subjects. Furthermore, the authors found that investigator-initiated studies have significantly (p=0.028) more problems in recruiting the requisite number of subjects than studies initiated by pharmaceutical companies. Potential solutions are discussed to reduce the number of studies that do not include a sufficient number of subjects.

  • Ethics
  • research
  • research subjects
  • human experimentation
  • ethics committees/consultation
  • scientific research

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • The concise argument
    Julian Savulescu