Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Paper
The ethics of attaching research conditions to access to new health technologies
- Correspondence to Stephen Holland, Department of Philosophy, University of York, York YO1 5DD, UK; stephen.holland{at}york.ac.uk
Citation
The ethics of attaching research conditions to access to new health technologies
Publication history
- Received October 13, 2011
- Revised December 13, 2011
- Accepted December 19, 2011
- First published February 16, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Practical metrics for establishing the health benefits of research to support research prioritisation
- What reasons do those with practical experience use in deciding on priorities for healthcare resources? A qualitative study
- The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process
- Public healthcare resource allocation and the Rule of Rescue
- Ageism and equality
- NICE is dead; long live NICE
- Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardiac devices in patients with systolic heart failure
- Review of the role of NICE in promoting the adoption of innovative cardiac technologies
- WHO evaluates NICE
- Does NICE apply the rule of rescue in its approach to highly specialised technologies?