Article info
PDFLaw, ethics and medicine
Paper
The gap between voluntary admission and detention in mental health units
- Correspondence to Dr Rachel Bingham, Amwell Group Practice, 4 Naoroji Street, London WC1X 0GB, UK; rachelbingham{at}nhs.net
Citation
The gap between voluntary admission and detention in mental health units
Publication history
- Received August 20, 2011
- Revised November 10, 2011
- Accepted November 19, 2011
- First published December 14, 2011.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Brain injury and deprivation of liberty on neurosciences wards: ‘a gilded cage is still a cage’
- Deprivation of liberty safeguards: how prepared are we?
- Locked inpatient units in modern mental health care: values and practice issues
- Pressure and coercion in the care for the addicted: ethical perspectives
- Identifying and managing deprivation of liberty in adults in England and Wales
- Ulysses arrangements in psychiatry: a matter of good care?
- Ethics briefing
- Deprivation of liberty safeguards and the Mental Capacity Act
- Palliative care clinicians' knowledge of the law regarding the use of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)
- “Idiots, infants, and the insane”: mental illness and legal incompetence