Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Paper
Sharing the benefits of research fairly: two approaches
- Correspondence to Dr Joseph Millum, Clinical Center Department of Bioethics/Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, 1C118, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; millumj{at}cc.nih.gov
Citation
Sharing the benefits of research fairly: two approaches
Publication history
- Received July 11, 2011
- Revised August 2, 2011
- Accepted August 23, 2011
- First published September 24, 2011.
Online issue publication
October 26, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Fair and equitable subject selection in concurrent COVID-19 clinical trials
- Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations
- Diversity and inclusion for rodents: how animal ethics committees can help improve translation
- A framework for the promotion of ethical benefit sharing in health research
- Viewing benefit sharing in global health research through the lens of Aristotelian justice
- A comparison of justice frameworks for international research
- Clinician gate-keeping in clinical research is not ethically defensible: an analysis
- HIV prevention research and global inequality: steps towards improved standards of care*
- Sharing the benefits of genetic research
- A public health perspective on research ethics