Article Text
Abstract
Making threats and offers to patients is a strategy used in community mental healthcare to increase treatment adherence. In this paper, an ethical analysis of these types of proposal is presented. It is argued (1) that the primary ethical consideration is to identify the professional duties of care held by those working in community mental health because the nature of these duties will enable a threat to be differentiated from an offer, (2) that threatening to act in a way that would equate with a failure to uphold the requirements of these duties is wrong, irrespective of the benefit accrued through treatment adherence and (3) that making offers to patients raises a number of secondary ethical considerations that need to be judged on their own merit in the context of individual patient care. The paper concludes by considering the implications of these arguments, setting out a pathway designed to assist community mental healthcare practitioners to determine whether making a specific proposal to a patient is right or wrong.
- Clinical ethics
- competence/incompetence/attribute
- mentally ill and disabled persons
- sociology
- psychiatry
- medical ethics
- resource allocation
- substance abusers/users of controlled substances
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding NHS National Institute of Health Research (NIHR). Grant number RP-PG-0606-1006. The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIHR.
Competing interests None.
Patient consent The paper is theoretical and does not involve patients.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Other content recommended for you
- Physicians’ personal values in determining medical decision-making capacity: a survey study
- Bioethics in a clinic for women with psychosis
- Trauma-informed approaches to primary and community mental health care: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
- Cohort profile: Mental Health Living Longer: a population-wide data linkage to understand and reduce premature mortality in mental health service users in New South Wales, Australia
- When psychiatry and bioethics disagree about patient decision making capacity (DMC)
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- Should healthcare professionals sometimes allow harm? The case of self-injury
- Ethics of the fiduciary relationship between patient and physician: the case of informed consent
- Assertive community treatment in psychiatry
- Adolescent autonomy revisited: clinicians need clearer guidance