Article info
The concise argument
Highlights from this issue
Citation
Highlights from this issue
Publication history
- First published February 17, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Still unconvinced, but still tentative: a reply to DeGrazia
- The biomedical enhancement of moral status
- Why we can't really say what post-persons are
- Pregnancy and superior moral status: a proposal for two thresholds of personhood
- Genetic Enhancement, Post-persons, and Moral Status: Author reply to commentaries
- Self-serving bias and the structure of moral status
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Still afraid of needy post-persons