Article info
PDFPapers
Research ethics
Participants’ responsibilities in clinical research
- Correspondence to
Dr David B Resnik, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 111 Alexander Drive, PO Box 12233, CU 03, Mail Drop CU 108, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA;resnikd{at}niehs.nih.gov
Citation
Participants’ responsibilities in clinical research
Publication history
- Received October 28, 2011
- Accepted June 20, 2012
- First published July 19, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- What makes clinical labour different? The case of human guinea pigging
- Scientific research is a moral duty
- “Fair’s fair argument” and voluntarism in clinical research: But, is it fair?
- Informed consent for functional MRI research on comatose patients following severe brain injury: balancing the social benefits of research against patient autonomy
- Should patients be allowed to veto their participation in clinical research?
- Streamlining the Clinical Research Enterprise
- Community based trials and informed consent in rural north India
- Recruiting historically under-represented individuals into Project ECHO Diabetes: using barrier analysis to understand disparities in clinical research in the USA
- Using digital tools in clinical, health and social care research: a mixed-methods study of UK stakeholders
- Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris