Article info
Response
Deciphering the appropriateness of defaults: the need for domain-specific evidence
- Correspondence to Dr Scott Halpern, Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 724 Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA; shalpern{at}exchange.upenn.edu
Citation
Deciphering the appropriateness of defaults: the need for domain-specific evidence
Publication history
- Received May 18, 2012
- Accepted May 23, 2012
- First published November 23, 2012.
Online issue publication
November 23, 2012
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Default options and neonatal resuscitation decisions
- Opinions of paediatricians who teach neonatal resuscitation about resuscitation practices on extremely preterm infants in the delivery room
- Quality of essential newborn care and neonatal resuscitation at health facilities in Afghanistan: a cross-sectional assessment
- Human or monitor feedback to improve mask ventilation during simulated neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- 2022 Eastern Regional Meeting
- Pulmonary air leak associated with CPAP at term birth resuscitation
- Ethical dilemmas of recording and reviewing neonatal resuscitation
- Frequent refresher training on newborn resuscitation and potential impact on perinatal outcome over time in a rural Tanzanian hospital: an observational study
- Comparing the utility of a novel neonatal resuscitation cart with a generic code cart using simulation: a randomised, controlled, crossover trial
- Chest compression during sustained inflation versus 3:1 chest compression:ventilation ratio during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised feasibility trial