Article info
PDFFeature article
Abortion and regret
- Correspondence to
Kate Greasley, New College, Holywell Street, Oxford OX1 3BN, UK; kate.greasley{at}new.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Abortion and regret
Publication history
- Received January 25, 2012
- Accepted June 27, 2012
- First published August 28, 2012.
Online issue publication
November 16, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Why there is no dilemma for the birth strategy: a response to Bobier and Omelianchuk
- ‘Rethinking “Disease”: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’
- Cursed lamp: the problem of spontaneous abortion
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- The Two tragedies argument
- Who should provide the uterus? The ethics of live donor recruitment for uterus transplantation
- Drawing the line in clinical treatment of companion animals: recommendations from an ethics working party
- “If we can show that we are helping adolescents to understand themselves, their feelings and their needs, then we are doing [a] valuable job”: counselling young people on sexual health in the Brook Advisory Centre (1965–1985)
- The role of anticipated decision regret and the patient's best interest in sterilisation and medically assisted reproduction