Article Text

PDF
Quantitative valuation placed by children and teenagers on participation in two hypothetical research scenarios
  1. Dan Funnell1,
  2. Caroline Fertleman2,
  3. Liz Carrey3,
  4. Joe Brierley4
  1. 1Department of Paediatrics, Institute of Child Health, London, UK
  2. 2Department of Paediatrics, the Whittington Hospital, London, UK
  3. 3UCL, Institute of Child Health, London, UK
  4. 4Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Joe Brierley, Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London WC1 3JH, UK; joe.brierley{at}gosh.nhs.uk

Abstract

For paediatric medicine to advance, research must be conducted specifically with children. Concern about poor recruitment has led to debate about payments to child research participants. Although concerns about undue influence by such ‘compensation’ have been expressed, it is useful to determine whether children can relate the time and inconvenience associated with participation to the value of payment offered. This study explores children's ability to determine fair remuneration for research participation, and reviews payments to children participating in research. Forty children were interviewed before outpatient visits at two London Hospitals: Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital and the Whittington Hospital District General Hospital. Children were asked to value their involvement in two hypothetical research scenarios – the first an ‘additional blood sample’, the second also involving daily oral oil capsules taken for a fortnight before further venesection. Background knowledge about familiarity with money, and experience with hospitalisation was assessed. The mean valuation of involvement in the second scenario (£13.18) was higher than in the first (£2.84) (p<0.001). This higher valuation persisted when children were categorised into groups ‘aged 12+’ and ‘below 12’. Those undergoing a blood test on the day placed a higher valuation on participation in the second scenario (£10.43, £21.67, p=0.044). These children aged 8–16 demonstrated the capacity to discern a fair valuation for participation in medical research. The monetary sums are influenced by the time and inconvenience involved in the research, and by the extent of recent experience with hospital procedures. The authors review current ethical thinking regarding payments to child research participants and suggest that a fair wage model might be an ethically acceptable way to increase participation of children in research.

  • Children
  • research ethics
  • research on special populations
  • policy guidelines/inst. review boards/review committees

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval South East London 3 proportionate review subcommittee of NRES.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • The concise argument
    Kenneth Boyd