Article info
PDFCommentaries
Prescription requirements: a reply to Taylor, Martin and Eyal
Citation
Prescription requirements: a reply to Taylor, Martin and Eyal
Publication history
- Received July 9, 2012
- Accepted July 11, 2012
- First published August 8, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Three arguments against prescription requirements
- The value of autonomy and the right to self-medication
- Advance decisions in dementia: when the past conflicts with the present
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
- Reconciling informed consent with prescription drug requirements
- Commentary on ‘Three arguments against prescription requirements’
- Ethics of placebo use in clinical practice: why we need to look beyond deontology
- Highlights from this issue
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- Theoretical resources for a globalised bioethics