Article Text

PDF
Paper
Unconscious conflict of interest: a Jewish perspective
  1. Azgad Gold2,
  2. Paul S Appelbaum1,2
  1. 1New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
  2. 2Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Azgad Gold, NY State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 122, New York, NY 10032, USA; atg2119{at}columbia.edu

Abstract

In contemporary medicine, it is not always obvious whether the acceptance of a benefit constitutes a conflict of interest. A particular area of controversy has been the impact of small gifts or other benefits from pharmaceutical companies on physicians' behaviour. Typically, in such cases, the gift is not an explicit reward for cooperation; the physician does not perceive the gift as an attempt to influence his or her judgement; and the reward is relatively minor. Under these circumstances, physicians are generally of the view that acceptance of gifts will not affect their behaviour, notwithstanding findings from social psychology and neuroscience that the impact of gifts is often unconscious, shaping action without a person's awareness. Here, we draw on traditional texts of Jewish law pertaining to the prohibition of taking a gift to illustrate recognition by the ancients of unconscious conflicts of interest, and their approach to dealing with the problem.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.