Article info
Editorial
Moral enhancement and pro-social behaviour
- Correspondence to Dr Sarah Chan, Institute for Science, Ethics and Innovation, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; sarah.chan{at}manchester.ac.uk
Citation
Moral enhancement and pro-social behaviour
Publication history
- Accepted November 18, 2010
- First published February 16, 2011.
Online issue publication
February 16, 2011
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Moral bioenhancement: a neuroscientific perspective
- ‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: an argument against moral enhancement
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- Taking liberties with free fall
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- Current knowledge in moral cognition can improve medical ethics
- Amoral enhancement
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Technological moral enhancement or traditional moral progress? Why not both?