Article info
The concise argument
The concise argument
- Correspondence to Soren Holme, UK; production.jme{at}bmjgroup.com
Citation
The concise argument
Publication history
- First published January 20, 2011.
Online issue publication
January 20, 2011
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
- Highlights from this issue
- Facebook activity of residents and fellows and its impact on the doctor–patient relationship
- Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
- Should research fraud be a crime?
- ‘Unfocused groups’: lessons learnt amid remote focus groups in the Philippines
- Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study
- Catalogue of errors in papers reporting clinical trials
- Facebook: can it be a diagnostic tool for neurologists?
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?